
Sinergias educativas
January - March Vol. 7 - 1 - 2022
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
highlight some criteria such as continuous improvement, leadership,
organization by processes, efficiency in information and
communication, teamwork, social relevance of the institutional
mission, relevance of the strategic and annual plan. The curricular
design area includes criteria such as innovation, congruence with the
graduate profile, thematic integration, contextualized learning. In the
educational environment, the efficiency of libraries, laboratories and
technological resources stands out; the sufficiency of physical space
in classrooms, libraries and laboratories is also considered. A factor
that is not so common is ergonomics, a complement to the
educational environment is the timely delivery of supplies.
One of the areas with a high percentage of incidence in the
evaluation corresponds to teaching competencies, which considers
the following criteria: impact, sense of relevance, identification with
the institution's mission, commitment to academic and professional
development, effectiveness in communication, appreciation of the
teaching profession, commitment to the exercise of university
functions, pedagogical and managerial competencies. Pedagogical
processes is another area in which criteria such as the internal
consistency of the training plan, efficiency of the teacher training
programs, student-teacher relationship, teaching staff workload
stand out. And no less important, the area of social transcendence,
which highlights criteria such as the social relevance of university
extension programs, coverage of extension programs, coverage of
teaching programs (De zapata, 2013, p. 8).
The culture of institutional evaluation should be instituted in the first
instance with a self-evaluation that exposes in-house the
shortcomings and strengths of the HEI, and then undergo the
external scrutiny of the institution that the model or the system
provides, of course, after agreeing to the implementation of an
improvement plan with the sole purpose of achieving quality.
According to the Costa Rican SINAES (National System of Higher
Education Accreditation), evaluation in the analysis of results in
general terms, it should be remembered that there are two major
areas of analytical production in the self-evaluation process: The
characterization of the career and the evaluation of the career.
(SINAES, 2011, p. 28).
In the context of higher education, the way to evaluate quality is
definitely the selection of standards according to the reality and the
educational environment of each country, which are in accordance